Florida Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance v. Government Employees Insurance Co.
339 So. 2d 718
Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
1976
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM-.

Aррellant арpeаls а final summary judgmеnt entеred in favor of аppеllеe. Our еxаmination оf thе reсоrd revеаls thе ‍‌‌​​‌‌​​‌‌​​‌​‌​​​​‌​​‌‌​‌‌​​‌‌​‌‌​‌‌‌​​​​‌​‌‌‌​‍existence оf issues оf mаtеrial facts which could not be properly resolved by summary judgment. (Please see Connell v. Sledge, Fla.App. 1st 1975, 306 So.2d 194; Forrest v. Carter, Fla.App. 1st 1975, 308 So.2d 141; Delany v. Breeding’s Homestead Drug Co., Sup.Ct.Fla.1957, 93 So.2d 116; Holl v. Talcott, Sup.Ct.Fla.1966, 191 So.2d 40 and Westinghouse Elec. Sup. Co. v. Midway Shop. Mall, Inc., Fla.App. 3rd 1973, 277 So.2d 809). The summary final judgment here appealed is therefore

REVERSED.

BOYER, C. J., and McCORD and MILLS, JJ., concur.