No. 34886 | Fla. | Jun 28, 1967

PER CURIAM.

The Respondent’s motion for reinstatement to active status at The Florida Bar is denied. Under our second opinion, 199 So. 2d 472" date_filed="1967-04-19" court="Fla." case_name="Florida Bar v. Wilkes">199 So. 2d 472, filed April 19, 1967, Respondent is entitled at the present time to demonstrate to The Florida Bar that he has rehabilitated himself and should be reinstated to practice. Respondent’s attention is directed to Rule VIII (2) of the Integration Rules of The Florida Bar, 31 F.S.A. with respect to the matter of Florida Bar dues.

THORNAL, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.
© 2024 Midpage AI does not provide legal advice. By using midpage, you consent to our Terms and Conditions.