midpage

Flores v. Lathrop Logistics LLCFlores v. Lathrop Logistics LLC

District Court, E.D. California
Aug 4, 2026
2:26-cv-02600

ORDER RELATING AND REASSIGNING CASES

An examination of the above-captioned actions reveals that they are related within the meaning of Local Rule 123(a). Accordingly, assignment of the above-captioned actions to the same district judge and magistrate judge will promote substantial efficiency and economy for the court and is likely to be convenient for the parties.

An order relating cases under this court‘s Local Rule 123 merely assigns them to the same district judge and magistrate judge—it does not consolidate the cases. The local rules of this district authorize the district judge with the lowest numbered case to order the reassignment of any higher numbered cases to himself or herself, upon determining that this assignment is likely to effect a savings of judicial effort. L.R. 123(c). Such good cause appearing here, the court orders that Case No. 2:26-cv-02278-TLN-AC and Case No. 2:26-cv-02600-TLN-CSK are reassigned to the undersigned and Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney. The caption on documents filed in the reassigned cases shall be shown as reflected above.

It is further ordered that the Clerk of the Court make appropriate adjustment in the assignment of civil cases to compensate for this reassignment.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 3, 2026

Dena Coggins

United States District Judge

Case Details

Case Name: Flores v. Lathrop Logistics LLC
Court Name: District Court, E.D. California
Date Published: Aug 4, 2026
Citation: 2:26-cv-02600
Docket Number: 2:26-cv-02600
Court Abbreviation: E.D. Cal.
Log In