History
  • No items yet
midpage
Fleurot v. Durand
14 Johns. 329
N.Y. Sup. Ct.
1817
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

There appears to be no established rule of practice in this respect. As the particulars of the plaintiff’s may be deemed as part of his declaration, we think it the proper course for the defendant to move for judgment, as in case of non pros, for want of the bill of particulars, as he might have done for want of a declaration. We, therefore, grant the rule that the plaintiff furnish to the defendant the particulars of his demand, in twenty days, or that a judgment of non pros be entered.

Rule granted.

Case Details

Case Name: Fleurot v. Durand
Court Name: New York Supreme Court
Date Published: Aug 15, 1817
Citation: 14 Johns. 329
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. Sup. Ct.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.