History
  • No items yet
midpage
Fleming v. Dorst
18 Ind. 493
Ind.
1862
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

In this case, the Court below rejected a paragraph of an answer denying the truth of the affidavit in attachment, and, exception was taken. That this was error, is settled in Foster v. Dryfus, 16 Ind. 158. But there was no motion for a new trial, and the question is, can the error be now taken advantage of on appeal? We think, according to Kent v. Lawson, 12 Ind. 675, a motion for a new trial on the ground of the error was- not necessary. This was not an error affecting the trial of an issue formed, but preventing the forming of an issue to try.

The judgment is reversed, with costs. Cause remanded, &c.

Case Details

Case Name: Fleming v. Dorst
Court Name: Indiana Supreme Court
Date Published: May 15, 1862
Citation: 18 Ind. 493
Court Abbreviation: Ind.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.