History
  • No items yet
midpage
Fleming v. Dolfin
292 P. 498
| Cal. Ct. App. | 1930
|
Check Treatment

This action having been decided in the municipal court of the city of Los Angeles, an appeal was taken to the superior court, wherein judgment was rendered in favor of the defendants, and the plaintiffs thereafter appealed to this court from said judgments.[1] The respondents moved to dismiss this appeal upon the ground that under the provisions of section 4b, article VI, of the Constitution, effective August 14, 1929, the superior court became the tribunal of final jurisdiction in such cases. However the appeal last mentioned was perfected prior to said date, hence the motion is without foundation. (Harris v. Moore, 102 Cal.App. 413 [283 P. 76]; Jones v. Summers, 105 Cal.App. 51 [286 P. 1093]; Berg v. Traeger, *Page 740 210 Cal. 323 [292 P. 495]; D.Q. Service Corp. v. SecuritiesLoan D. Co., 210 Cal. 327 [292 P. 497].)

The motion to dismiss the appeal is denied.

Works, P.J., and Thompson (Ira F.), J., concurred.

Case Details

Case Name: Fleming v. Dolfin
Court Name: California Court of Appeal
Date Published: Oct 3, 1930
Citation: 292 P. 498
Docket Number: Docket No. 5831.
Court Abbreviation: Cal. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.