History
  • No items yet
midpage
Flanagan v. Schwartz
40 N.Y.2d 910
NY
1976
Check Treatment

Memorandum. The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

The record discloses that there were 1,617 signatures on the designating petition; 1,500 were required under the statute. It was stipulated at Special Term that 75 signatures were invalid. We conclude that another 134 signatures must be invalidated for omission or error with respect to the election or assembly district of subscribing witnesses (Matter of Rutter v Coveney, 38 NY2d 993; cf. Matter of Berry v Dodd, 38 NY2d 995). There accordingly were insufficient signatures to validate the petition. We neither reach nor consider the other issues tendered (see Matter of White v McNab, 40 NY2d 912, decided herewith).

Chief Judge Breitel and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Cooke concur.

Order affirmed, without costs, in a memorandum.

Case Details

Case Name: Flanagan v. Schwartz
Court Name: New York Court of Appeals
Date Published: Oct 27, 1976
Citation: 40 N.Y.2d 910
Court Abbreviation: NY
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.