Fixman v. FixmanFixman v. Fixman
In a child support proceeding pursuant to the
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
The mother contends that the Family Court erred in determining that she was not entitled to child support arrears which were allegedly due and owing pursuant to a pendente lite order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated August 30, 1994, because the parties’ New York matrimonial action was dismissed with prejudice in 2002. We agree that the dismissal of the New York matrimonial action did not preclude the mother from seeking any arrears which may have accrued while the pendente lite order remained in effect, and that she could enforce the father‘s support obligation by seeking leave to enter a money judgment (see Mesholam v Mesholam, 25 AD3d 670 [2006]; Fotiadis v Fotiadis, 18 AD3d 699 [2005]; Matter of Dyandria M. v Gerard M.-, 278 AD2d 37 [2000]; Cawthon v Cawthon, 276 AD2d 661, 662 [2000]; King v King, 230 AD2d 775, 776 [1996]; Walis v Walis, 192 AD2d 598 [1993]; Patricia Lynn N. v Vincent Michael N.-, 152 AD2d 547 [1989]). However,