History
  • No items yet
midpage
Fitzpatrick v. Moore
53 Ark. 4
Ark.
1890
Check Treatment
PER Curiam.

The consideration of the contract is not set forth in the written evidence of it, and the proof to show what the consideration was does not vary the terms of the writing. The court’s finding of facts is sustained by the evidence, and the judgment is affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Fitzpatrick v. Moore
Court Name: Supreme Court of Arkansas
Date Published: Mar 1, 1890
Citation: 53 Ark. 4
Court Abbreviation: Ark.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.