History
  • No items yet
midpage
Fitzhuch v. Runyon
8 Johns. 375
N.Y. Sup. Ct.
1811
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

The parol proof to show that there was a mistake in the written contract, was inadmissible. It *376js a well settled rule, that, such proof is never admissible, ’ , r . . in a court of law, to contradict a writing. The judgment below, must be reversed.

Judgment reversed.

Case Details

Case Name: Fitzhuch v. Runyon
Court Name: New York Supreme Court
Date Published: Oct 15, 1811
Citation: 8 Johns. 375
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. Sup. Ct.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.