Fitzhuch v. Runyon

8 Johns. 375 | N.Y. Sup. Ct. | 1811

Per Curiam.

The parol proof to show that there was a mistake in the written contract, was inadmissible. It js a well settled rule, that, such proof is never admissible, ’ , r . . in a court of law, to contradict a writing. The judgment below, must be reversed.

Judgment reversed.