History
  • No items yet
midpage
Fitzgibbins v. Yennie
132 Minn. 473
Minn.
1916
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

Action in claim and delivery for the possession of certain personal property. The property was taken by the sheriff, but was rebonded by and returned to defendant. Whereupon defendant moved to “set aside and vacate” the action on the ground that it could not be maintained since by the complaint it appears that the parties to the action are owners of the property as tenants in common. The motion was denied and defendant appealed. Plaintiff moves to dismiss the appeal on the ground that the order is not appealable. *474The motion is granted. The motion, below to “vacate -and set aside the action” was in effect a motion to dismiss the action and the order denying the same is clearly not appealable. Pillsbury v. Foley, 61 Minn. 434, 63 N. W. 1027.

Appeal dismissed.

October, 1915, term calendar.

Case Details

Case Name: Fitzgibbins v. Yennie
Court Name: Supreme Court of Minnesota
Date Published: Apr 7, 1916
Citation: 132 Minn. 473
Docket Number: Nos. 19,767—(167)
Court Abbreviation: Minn.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.