Fisher v. OklahomaFisher v. Oklahoma
- Reporters:
- Before:
- Brennan
Lead Opinion
Ct. Crim. App. Okla.;
Sup. Ct. N. C.;
Gen. Ct. Justice, Super. Ct. Div., Forsyth County, N. C.;
Ct. Crim. App. Tex.;
Sup. Ct. Wash.;
Sup. Ct. Fla.;
Sup. Ct. N. C.;
Ct. Crim. App. Tex.; and
Ct. Crim. App. Tex. Certiorari denied. Reported below: No. 87-6008, 736 P. 2d 1003 *1062and 739 P. 2d 523; No. 87-6125, 320 N. C. 688, 360 S. E. 2d 667; No. 87-6365, 744 S. W. 2d 53; No. 87-6460, 108 Wash. 2d 734, 743 P. 2d 210; No. 87-6644, 520 So. 2d 246; No. 87-6674, 321 N. C. 125, 362 S. E. 2d 513; No. 87-6774, 741 S. W. 2d 382; No. 87-6845, 736 S. W. 2d 673.
Dissenting Opinion
dissenting.
Adhering to our views that the death penalty is in all circumstances cruel and unusual punishment prohibited by the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments, Gregg v. Georgia, 428 U. S. 153, 227, 231 (1976), we would grant certiorari and vacate the death sentences in these cases.