History
  • No items yet
midpage
Fisher v. Findlay
293 Pa. Super. 293
Pa. Super. Ct.
1981
Check Treatment

Lead Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Appellants have filed their appeal from the lower court’s order refusing appellants’ motion to set aside judgment of compulsory non-suit. Because the order has not been reduced to judgment and docketed, on the basis of Pa.R.A.P. 301(c) the appeal is untimely. Durkin & Sons, Inc. v. Nether Providence Township School Authority, 291 Pa.Superior Ct. 402, 435 A.2d 1288 (1981).

Appeal quashed.

VAN der VOORT, J., filed a dissenting opinion.





Dissenting Opinion

VAN der VOORT, Judge,

dissenting:

I respectfully dissent from the action of the majority which holds that the order refusing appellants’ motion to set aside judgment of compulsory nonsuit is not appealable because the order was not reduced to judgment and docketed. I would hold that the order of the court below refusing to take off the nonsuit is properly before this Court for review. See my concurring and dissenting opinion in Durkin & Sons, Inc. v. Nether Providence Township School Authority, 291 Pa.Superior Ct. 402, 435 A.2d 1288 (1981).

Case Details

Case Name: Fisher v. Findlay
Court Name: Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: Dec 18, 1981
Citation: 293 Pa. Super. 293
Docket Number: No. 852
Court Abbreviation: Pa. Super. Ct.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.