138 Pa. 301 | Pa. | 1890
The first three assignments of error do not conform to the Rules of Court. The fourth alleges that the court below erred in not affirming the appellant’s first point, which point was as follows:
“ That a natural-gas company has no right in law to set off against damages for right of way, any benefits, either general or special, which may accrue to the property by reason of the presence of its line. ”
The natural-gas act of 1885, provides that if the company cannot agree with the owner as to the amount of damages, the
Judgment affirmed.