History
  • No items yet
midpage
Fischer v. Shugg
195 N.Y.S.2d 417
N.Y. App. Term.
1959
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

Service of the notice of motion on attorneys who had no authority to appear for the landlord was not service upon the latter. Accordingly, the court had no jurisdiction to entertain the motion (cf. Bittson v. Bittson, 3 A D 2d 847).

The order dated March 23, 1959 should be reversed, with $10 costs, and final order reinstated, without prejudice to renewal of tenant’s motion to vacate final order upon proper notice to landlord.

Concur — Hoestadter, J. P., Hecht and Aurelio, JJ.

Order reversed, etc.

Case Details

Case Name: Fischer v. Shugg
Court Name: Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Date Published: Jun 4, 1959
Citation: 195 N.Y.S.2d 417
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Term.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.