History
  • No items yet
midpage
Fischer v. Dalmas
173 Pa. 296
Pa.
1896
Check Treatment

Opinion by

Mr. Chief Justice Sterrett,

We are not convinced that the learned court erred in refusing to enter judgment against the defendant for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense.

Inasmuch as the case goes back for a jury trial, it is neither necessary nor desirable to discuss the questions presented by the affidavit of defense. If the plaintiff had been disposed to waive his right of appeal to this court and proceed to trial, he might have had his-case finally disposed of long ago.

Appeal dismissed, at plaintiff’s costs, without prejudice, etc.

Case Details

Case Name: Fischer v. Dalmas
Court Name: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: Jan 20, 1896
Citation: 173 Pa. 296
Docket Number: Appeal, No. 325
Court Abbreviation: Pa.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.