History
  • No items yet
midpage
Firth & Foster Bros. v. Hamill
167 Pa. 382
Pa.
1895
Check Treatment
Per Curiam,

The questions involved in this case are clearly stated and correctly disposed of by the learned referee. We find nothing in the record that would justify us in sustaining any of the specifications of error; nor do we think that either of them requires special notice. The judgment of the court below, dismissing appellant’s exceptions and confirming the finding of the referee in favor of plaintiff, is affirmed on the referee’s report.

Case Details

Case Name: Firth & Foster Bros. v. Hamill
Court Name: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: Apr 8, 1895
Citation: 167 Pa. 382
Docket Number: Appeal, No. 59
Court Abbreviation: Pa.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.