289 N.W. 416 | S.D. | 1939
This case is before this court a second time. See First National Bank of Pipestone v. Siman et al.,
We are content to rest our decision of the federal questions involved upon the reasoning of the Minnesota court in the Ellingson case. The trial court in this case having found against the appellant, it follows that the judgment and order appealed from should be, and are, affirmed.
All the Judges concur.