First National Bank v. Peisert

2 Pennyp. 277 | Pa. | 1882

— Per Curiam:

That the president of the bank knew that the moneys deposited by the plaintiff were the funds of the assigned estate of Miller, was a fact of which there was ample evidence, and it was fairly submitted to the jury. This knowledge he acquired in the course of the business of the bank. That from such knowledge the bank is affected with notice is very clearly settled in Harrisburg v. Tyler, 3 W. & S., 373, and other cases.

Judgment affirmed.