No. 333 | SCOTUS | May 22, 1916

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of (1) Eustis v. Bolles, 150 U.S. 361" date_filed="1893-11-20" court="SCOTUS" case_name="Eustis v. Bolles">150 U. S. 361; Chemical National Bank v. City Bank of Portage, 160 U.S. 646" date_filed="1896-01-27" court="SCOTUS" case_name="Chemical Bank v. City Bank of Portage">160 U. S. 646; Leathe v. Thomas, 207 U.S. 93" date_filed="1907-11-11" court="SCOTUS" case_name="Leathe v. Thomas">207 U. S. 93; Mellon v. McCafferty, 239 U.S. 134" date_filed="1915-11-29" court="SCOTUS" case_name="Mellon Co. v. McCafferty">239 U. S. 134. (2) Leather Manufacturers’ Bank v. Cooper, 120 U.S. 778" date_filed="1887-03-21" court="SCOTUS" case_name="Leather Manufacturers' Bank v. Cooper">120 U. S. 778, 781; Whittemore v. Amoskeag National Bank, 134 U.S. 527" date_filed="1890-04-07" court="SCOTUS" case_name="Whittemore v. Amoskeag National Bank">134 U. S. 527; Petri v. Commercial National Bank of Chicago, 142 U.S. 644" date_filed="1892-01-18" court="SCOTUS" case_name="Petri v. Commercial Nat. Bank of Chicago">142 U. S. 644; Hermann v. Edwards, 238 U.S. 107" date_filed="1915-06-14" court="SCOTUS" case_name="Herrmann v. Edwards">238 U. S. 107.

© 2024 Midpage AI does not provide legal advice. By using midpage, you consent to our Terms and Conditions.