History
  • No items yet
midpage
179 A. 309
N.J.
1935
Per Curiam.

The judgment appealed from is affirmed. Where a co-maker places his signature upon a note at a place other than the place where a small loan business is being conducted that circumstance does not void the instrument under chapter 62 of Pamph. L. 1932. N. J. Stat. Annual 1932, p. 48, § 35-22.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Bodine, Heher, Perskie, Van Buskirk, Kays, Heteield, Dear, Wells, JJ. 12.

For reversal — None.

Case Details

Case Name: First Industrial Loan Co. v. Rosenhand
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Date Published: May 24, 1935
Citations: 179 A. 309; 115 N.J.L. 252; 1935 N.J. LEXIS 306
Court Abbreviation: N.J.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Log In