History
  • No items yet
midpage
Finkle v. CARROLL III
44 A.3d 184
Conn.
2012
Check Treatment
44 A.3d 184 (2012)
305 Conn. 907

Jennie FINKLE, Administratrix (Estate of Barbara A. Eckert)
v.
John F. CARROLL III et al.

SC 18976

Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Decided May 30, 2012.

Steven D. Ecker, Hartford, and M. Caitlin S. Anderson, in support of the petition.

Scott M. Karsten, in opposition.

The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 134 Conn.App. 278, 37 A.3d 851, is granted, limited to the following issue:

"Did the Appellate Court properly determine that the plaintiffs action was not saved by General Statutes § 52-593?"

Case Details

Case Name: Finkle v. CARROLL III
Court Name: Supreme Court of Connecticut
Date Published: May 30, 2012
Citation: 44 A.3d 184
Docket Number: SC 18976
Court Abbreviation: Conn.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Log In