Fink v. StateFink v. State
- Reporters:
- , ,
- Before:
- Smith
The Criminal Code definition of rape includes deviate sexual activity, which encompasses the penetration of the anus of one person by the penis of another.
The only argument for reversal is that the State failed to prove the required element of forcible compulsion, which is defined to include physical force or an express or implied threat of physical injury.
Here one or both of the children testified that the conduct occurred a number of times, that they did not want to engage in it, that they were afraid of their father, that he would threaten to whip them with a belt, and that if they didn’t “mess around” with him he would give them a whipping. A physician testified that the rectum of each child was stretched and inflamed and that in his opinion the conditions had been caused by the insertion of an adult penis many times. Thus there was an abundance of substantial evidence from which the jury could conclude that the accused had achieved his purpose by forcible compulsion.
Affirmed.
JJ-We agree. Harris, C.J., and Byrd, Holt, and Hickman,