Fink v. HarderFink v. Harder
Oct 17, 1932
- Reporters:
- , ,
- Before:
- Per Curiam.
The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Vice-Chancellor Pailón.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Trenchard, Parker, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Brogan, Van Buskirk, Kays, Dear, Wells, Keeney, JJ. 13.
For reversal — None.