History
  • No items yet
midpage
Fink v. Ash
99 Ga. 106
Ga.
1896
Check Treatment
Simmons, C. J.

The evidence warranted the verdict, which was reasonable in amount, and if the court committed any error at all, it was not such as would require a new trial.

Judgment affirmed; cross-hill of exceptions dismissed.

Action for damages. Before Judge Harris. City court of Floyd county. March term, 1895. McOutohm & Shumate and Hoskinson & Harris, for receivers. Dean cG Dean, contra.

Case Details

Case Name: Fink v. Ash
Court Name: Supreme Court of Georgia
Date Published: May 19, 1896
Citation: 99 Ga. 106
Court Abbreviation: Ga.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.