24 Ga. App. 339 | Ga. Ct. App. | 1919
The 4th headnote alone needs elaboration. The holding there is not in conflict with the ruling in Roberts v. State, 92 Ga. 451 (17 S. E. 262), which is as follows: “Alleged errors in ‘failing to charge as to the legal presumption of innocence/
Judgment reversed.