Fife v. State

Mar 6, 1923
14126
Versions:30 Ga. App. 23
116 S.E. 912
1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 224
Luke, J.

The evidence was wholly circumstantial and did not exclude every reasonable hypothesis save that of the defendant’s guilt. The court, therefore, erred in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment reversed.

Broyles, G. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur. W. II. Ennis, for plaintiff in error, James Maddox, solicitor, contra,