The evidence was wholly circumstantial and did not exclude every reasonable hypothesis save that of the defendant’s guilt. The court, therefore, erred in overruling the motion for a new trial.
Judgment reversed.
Broyles, G. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.W. II. Ennis, for plaintiff in error,James Maddox, solicitor, contra,
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
