History
  • No items yet
midpage
Field v. Anderson
55 Ark. 546
Ark.
1892
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

It was necessary for the appellant either to produce the note or to account for it, in order to show that he was entitled to collect it. The allegation that it was lost was material. Norris v. Kellogg, 7 Ark., 118. That allegation was denied by the answer, it was not proved upon the trial, and the note was not produced. If there were no other reason for dismissing the complaint, that would be .sufficient.

Affirm.

Case Details

Case Name: Field v. Anderson
Court Name: Supreme Court of Arkansas
Date Published: Mar 12, 1892
Citation: 55 Ark. 546
Court Abbreviation: Ark.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.