Where in an action on a fire-insurance policy the declaration alleges compliance with the terms of the policy as to the filing of a claim, which was prerequisite to the filing of the action on the policy, it was error for the court to direct a verdict for the plaintiff when there was no evidence as to such compliance with the terms of the policy. This is true even if there was evidence as to a waiver of such compliance, in the absence of an amendment to the petition setting forth such waiver.
Fidelity & Casualty Co.
v.
Gate City Nat. Bank,
97
Ga.
634 (4) (25 S. E.
392); New Zealand Fire Ins. Co.
v.
Brewer,
29
Ga. App.
773 (
The court erred in overruling the motion for a new trial.
Judgment reversed.
