History
  • No items yet
midpage
310 A.2d 128
Del.
1973
*129 PER CURIAM:

For the reasons stated in the careful opinion below (Del.Super., 302 A.2d 327), we agree that the plaintiff may maintain this action against F. I. duPont, Glore For-gan & Company, a limited partnership, in its common name as a partnership entity, without joinder of individual partners.

It is to be noted that any doubt as to the meaning of 10 Del.C. § 3904 in this regard has now been removed by the July 1, 1973 amendment thereto, - Del.L.Ch. -. *

The judgment below is affirmed.

Notes

*

10 Del.C. § 3904, ns amended, provides:

“§ 3904. Suits and Judgments by and Against Unincorporated Associations
“An unincorporated association of persons, including a partnership, using a common name may sue and be sued in such common name and a judgment recovered therein shall be a lien like other judgments, and may be executed upon by levy, seizure and sale of the personal and real estate of such association, and also that of the persons composing such association in the same manner with respect to them ns if they had been made parties defendant by their individual names. Satisfaction thereof may also be obtained by attachment process.”

Case Details

Case Name: FI Du Pont, Glore Forgan & Company v. Silliman
Court Name: Supreme Court of Delaware
Date Published: Sep 6, 1973
Citations: 310 A.2d 128; 1973 Del. LEXIS 241
Court Abbreviation: Del.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Log In