533 So. 2d 914 | Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | 1988
Defendant appeals his convictions for two counts of armed burglary, three counts of armed kidnapping, two counts of armed robbery, two counts of sexual battery, and one count of aggravated assault. We affirm.
We.do not agree with defendant’s first contention that the trial court erred in denying defendant’s motion to sever the trials of different offenses. See Livingston v. State, No. 68,323 (Fla. Mar. 10,1988) [13 FLW 187].
We do not agree with defendant’s second contention that a double jeopardy violation occurred from defendant having been convicted and sentenced for two armed robberies of the same victim during one automobile journey. The robberies, while committed, in a sense, during one “transac
We find no merit in defendant’s third contention.
AFFIRMED.