History
  • No items yet
midpage
Few v. Gunter
72 S.E. 720
Ga. Ct. App.
1911
Check Treatment
Hill, C. J.

1. Where a prisoner is in the common jail of the county under a warrant charging a bailable offense, and, in order to be released from imprisonment, he employs a lawyer to secure for him a bond and to represent him in the case, and the attorney does secure the bond and the prisoner is thereupon released, held, that a note given by the prisoner to the lawyer for his services, including the service rendered in procuring the bond, is valid and collectible, although executed on Sunday. The case is within the exception of section 416 of the Penal Code (1910), the service being in the nature of a “work of charity or necessity.”

*101Decided November 20, 1911. Complaint; from city court of Monroe — Judge Stone. February 4, 1911. M. G. Few, Orrin Roberts, for plaintiff.

2. The evidence applicable to the foregoing principle of law demanded a verdict for the plaintiff, and the court erred in not granting a new trial. Salter v. Smith, 55 Ga. 245; Weldon v. Colquitt, 62 Ga. 449 (35 Am. Rep. 128); Adams v. Candler, 114 Ga. 152 (39 S. E. 893).

Judgment reversed.

Case Details

Case Name: Few v. Gunter
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Georgia
Date Published: Nov 20, 1911
Citation: 72 S.E. 720
Docket Number: 3254
Court Abbreviation: Ga. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.