History
  • No items yet
midpage
Ferrebee v. Boggs
18 Ohio St. 2d 87
Ohio
1969
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

It is clear from the record, the briefs and oral argument that a valid bill of exceptions containing evidence submitted in the trial of March 1967, was properly filed and certified, as required by Section 2321.06, Revised Code, and was duly filed in the Court of Appeals.

The clerk’s failure to officially stamp it cannot prevent the court from using it to consider issues on appeal. King v. Penn, 43 Ohio St. 57; Cincinnati Traction Co. v. Ruthman, 85 Ohio St. 62. See, also, Lewis v. Public Finance Corp., 9 Ohio App. 2d 215.

The judgment of the Court of Appeals is reversed and the cause is remanded to that court for consideration upon the merits, with instructions to consider appellant’s bill of exceptions.

Judgment reversed.

Taft, C. J., Zimmerman, Matthias, O’Neihl, Schneider, Herbert and Duncan, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Ferrebee v. Boggs
Court Name: Ohio Supreme Court
Date Published: May 14, 1969
Citation: 18 Ohio St. 2d 87
Docket Number: No. 68-712
Court Abbreviation: Ohio
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.