History
  • No items yet
midpage
Ferns v. American Moore Peg Co.
81 N.H. 283
| N.H. | 1924
|
Check Treatment

The court in construing P. S., c. 141, ss. 9 and 17, holds that one to whom s. 9 gives a lien can preserve it by suit, but to do that he must (1) state in his writ the purpose for which the suit is brought, s. 17; (2) describe the property on which he claims the lien with reasonable accuracy, Hill v. Callahan, 58 N.H. 497; and (3) direct the officer to attach it to preserve his lien, Wason v. Martel, 68 N.H. 560. While the plaintiffs stated in their writ that the suit was "brought for the purpose of securing a mechanic's lien," they did neither of the other things the court holds they must do to preserve their lien.

Exception overruled.

All concurred. *Page 284

Case Details

Case Name: Ferns v. American Moore Peg Co.
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Date Published: Apr 1, 1924
Citation: 81 N.H. 283
Court Abbreviation: N.H.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.