midpage

Ferguson v. StateFerguson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida
Sep 21, 1989
No. 89-172
Reporters:
, , ,
Before:
Goshorn
GOSHORN, Judge.

The appellant, Robert Ferguson, appeals his guideline departure sentence because the trial judge did not provide written reasons for departure as required by Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.701(d)(ll). Accordingly, the sentence is vacated and remanded for resen-tencing. See Wilkerson v. State, 513 So.2d 664 (Fla.1987); State v. Jackson, 478 So.2d 1054 (Fla.1985), superceded on other grounds by Miller v. Florida, 482 U.S. 423, 107 S.Ct. 2446, 96 L.Ed.2d 351 (1987). If, upon remand, the trial court imposes a departure sentence, it must supply written reasons. Pope v. State, 542 So.2d 423 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989).

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

SHARP, J. and ORFINGER, M., J., (retired), concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Ferguson v. State
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Sep 21, 1989
Citations: 548 So. 2d 1183; 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2231; 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 5136; 1989 WL 107522; No. 89-172
Docket Number: No. 89-172
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
Log In