Ferguson v. State

545 So. 2d 505 | Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | 1989

ERVIN, Judge.

Appellant appeals his written sentence, which varies from that pronounced in open court. We remand for the purpose of correcting the written sentence to conform to the oral sentence, because the oral pronouncement controls. Timmons v. State, 453 So.2d 143, 144 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984).

REVERSED and REMANDED.

SHIVERS and JOANOS, JJ., concur.