History
  • No items yet
midpage
Ferguson v. State
83 Tex. Crim. 272
Tex. Crim. App.
1918
Check Treatment

Appellant was convicted of theft of property over $50 and given five years in the penitentiary.

There is but one bill of exception in the record and this was reserved to the action of the court in overruling the motion for new trial. This bill adds nothing to the motion for new trial, nor does it undertake to verify any statements made in the motion. The bill does not change, add to or detract from the contents of the motion for new trial.

The Assistant Attorney General moves to eliminate the statement of facts from consideration because it is made up of questions and answers. An inspection of the statement of facts shows his position is sustained. Under the authorities the statement of facts can not be considered. The motion of the Assistant Attorney General will, therefore, be sustained.

In the absence of statement of facts under the condition of the record, there is no question presented that can be reviewed. The judgment will be affirmed.

Affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Ferguson v. State
Court Name: Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Date Published: Apr 10, 1918
Citation: 83 Tex. Crim. 272
Docket Number: No. 4988.
Court Abbreviation: Tex. Crim. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.