History
  • No items yet
midpage
Ferguson v. Rex Spinning Co.
174 S.E. 300
N.C.
1934
Check Treatment

In Batson v. Laundry Co., ante, 371, is the following: "In the case at bar the trial judge heard no evidence and found no facts. Hence, it does not appear whether the merits of the present case and substantially identical to the former case or not. Therefore, the Court is of the opinion that the judgment dismissing the action upon the plea of estoppel, was prematurely and inadvertently made." For the reasons given, the judgment of the court below is

Reversed.

Case Details

Case Name: Ferguson v. Rex Spinning Co.
Court Name: Supreme Court of North Carolina
Date Published: May 2, 1934
Citation: 174 S.E. 300
Court Abbreviation: N.C.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.