Ferber v. Cona

91 N.J.L. 688 | N.J. | 1918

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review will be affirmed, for the reasons set forth in the opinion of the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Swayze, Trenchard, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, White, Williams, Taylor, Gardner, JJ. 10.

For reversal — None.