History
  • No items yet
midpage
Fenn v. Fenn
130 Me. 520
Me.
1931
Check Treatment

This report of this cause in equity, brought to obtain a construction of the will of William H. Fenn, late of Portland, Maine, deceased, must be discharged. Of the thirty-seven defendants, individual and representative, sixteen only appear, answer and agree to this report. Twenty-one defendants failed to appear, the bill is taken pro confesso against them and the cause reported without their agreement.

George C. Otto and Frederick R. Dyer, for plaintiff. John F. Dana, Eugene L. Bodge, John B. Kehoe, for defendants.

This Law Court has jurisdiction to determine causes in equity certified on report only when the presiding Justice is of opinion, and so certifies, that a question of law is involved of sufficient importance or doubt to justify the same, and the parties agree thereto. R. S., Chap. 91, Sec. 56; Baker v. Johnson, 41 Me., 15; Whittemore v. Russell, 78 Me., 337. Defendants in default in an equity action under a decree pro confesso are still parties and have some rights. Unless all parties agree to a report of the cause in which they are joined, we think it is the duty of the sitting Justice to hear the evidence and make such rules, orders or decrees thereon as the law of the case requires. Under this procedure, any party aggrieved has the right of exception and appeal reserved to him and the rights of all other parties are left unimpaired. Report discharged.

Case Details

Case Name: Fenn v. Fenn
Court Name: Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Date Published: Jul 30, 1931
Citation: 130 Me. 520
Court Abbreviation: Me.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.