History
  • No items yet
midpage
Feltman v. Ward
269 A.D. 786
N.Y. App. Div.
1945
Check Treatment

Upon appeal by plaintiffs, the judgment insofar as appealed from is unanimously affirmed, without costs. On appeal by defendants other than the City of New York, the judgment insofar as appealed from is reversed on the law and the facts, with costs against plaintiffs, and the complaint is dismissed on the law, with costs against plaintiffs. The findings of fact and the conclusion of law implicit in the short form decision of the Special Term as contained in the last paragraph thereof are disapproved and, in lieu thereof, this court will make new findings of fact and conclusions of law. The conversation with William J. Ward, Sr., as testified to by the witness Charles A. Feltman, does not establish an agreement for a permanent easement of access and egress and, in any event, the expense by plaintiffs in making the alterations attributable to the alleged agreement, does not prevent the invocation of the Statute of Frauds. Settle order on notice. Close, P. J., Hagarty, Adel and Aldrich, JJ., concur; Carswell, J., not voting. [See post, pp. 843, 865.]

Case Details

Case Name: Feltman v. Ward
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: May 21, 1945
Citation: 269 A.D. 786
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.