History
  • No items yet
midpage
Felker v. Chesley
29 A. 540
| N.H. | 1890
|
Check Treatment

The defendant's duty is not an open question. The arithmetical error could have been corrected by the moderator in a supplementary public declaration before the close of the meeting, but could not be corrected by the clerk in his record and return without such correctional action taken by the moderator. Bell v. Pike, 53 N.H. 473, 481; Opinion of the Justices,53 N.H. 640, 643; Hill v. Goodwin, 56 N.H. 441.

Petition granted.

DOE, C. J., and BINGHAM, J., did not sit: the others concurred.

Case Details

Case Name: Felker v. Chesley
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Date Published: Dec 5, 1890
Citation: 29 A. 540
Court Abbreviation: N.H.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.