midpage

Felder v. StateFelder v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida
Sep 27, 2000
No. 3D99-1717
Versions:767 So. 2d 1267
2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 12324
2000 WL 1397513
PER CURIAM.

We affirm defendant’s convictions. Defendant misplaces his reliance on Conner v. State, 748 So.2d 950 (Fla.1999)(elderly adult hearsay exception facially unconstitutional),- cert denied, — U.S. -, 120 S.Ct. 2719, 147 L.Ed.2d 984 (2000), when, as here, the victims testified at trial under oath, and were subject to extensive cross-examination. Any error in admitting the victims’ cumulative hearsay statements was entirely harmless. See State v. DiGuilio, 491 So.2d 1129 (Fla.1986).

Affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Felder v. State
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Sep 27, 2000
Citations: 767 So. 2d 1267; 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 12324; 2000 WL 1397513; No. 3D99-1717
Docket Number: No. 3D99-1717
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
Log In