History
  • No items yet
midpage
353 F.3d 765
9th Cir.
2003

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

We affirm for reasons stated by the district court in its opinion, Feitelberg v. Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc., 234 F.Supp.2d 1043 (N.D.Cal.2002).*

AFFIRMED.

Notes

We deny Feitelberg’s Request for Judicial Notice and Merrill Lynch’s request for sanctions.

Case Details

Case Name: Feitelberg v. Merrill Lynch & Co.
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Date Published: Dec 24, 2003
Citations: 353 F.3d 765; 2003 WL 23010238; No. 02-17236
Docket Number: No. 02-17236
Court Abbreviation: 9th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified
and are not legal advice.
Log In