43 Pa. Super. 333 | Pa. Super. Ct. | 1910
Opinion by
The learned counsel for the appellant states the question involved as follows: "Whether equity will intervene for the relief of a partner who is the victim of fraud in the course of dissolution of the partnership, whereby the other partner has become possessed exclusively of the assets of the firm, which he acquires on the. footing of an agreed interpretation of ambiguous words in the stipulated plan of dissolution, which agreed interpretation such other partner repudiates after he has gained possession of the assets?” This may be taken as a sufficient statement of the general scope of the bill, if coupled with the explana
The third and fourth assignments need not be elaborated upon, because, in the absence of any evidence sustaining the allegations of the bill, the decree was clearly right.
The decree is affirmed at the costs of the appellant.