midpage

Feighan v. SobersFeighan v. Sobers

Supreme Court of New Jersey
May 8, 1914
Reporters:
, ,
Per Curiam..

The judgment under review heroin should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Voorjiees in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — Tt-te Chancellor, Chief Justice, Garrison, Swayze, T ken chard, Bergen, Minturn, Bogert, Vredenburgh, White, Heppenheimek, JJ. 11.

For reversal — None.

Case Details

Case Name: Feighan v. Sobers
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Date Published: May 8, 1914
Citations: 91 A. 1068; 86 N.J.L. 356; 1914 N.J. LEXIS 264
Court Abbreviation: N.J.
Log In