Feighan v. Sobers

May 8, 1914
Versions:91 A. 1068
86 N.J.L. 356
1914 N.J. LEXIS 264
Per Curiam..

The judgment under review heroin should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Voorjiees in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — Tt-te Chancellor, Chief Justice, Garrison, Swayze, T ken chard, Bergen, Minturn, Bogert, Vredenburgh, White, Heppenheimek, JJ. 11.

For reversal — None.