History
  • No items yet
midpage
Fee v. Starr
13 Cal. 170
Cal.
1859
Check Treatment
Terry, C. J. delivered the opinion of the Court

Baldwin, J. concurring.

There is in the record no properly authenticated statement or bill of exceptions, setting out the evidence.

The statement in the record is neither signed by the Judge, nor agreed to by the parties, nor does it appear that a copy was ever served on Respondent or his Attorney.

*171The Clerk’s certificate that the statement is the same which was used on the argument of the motion for a new trial, is entitled to no weight, as the Clerk is not authorized by law to verify a statement in that form.

The judgment roll disclosing no irregularities, the judgment is affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Fee v. Starr
Court Name: California Supreme Court
Date Published: Jul 1, 1859
Citation: 13 Cal. 170
Court Abbreviation: Cal.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.