Febles v. Talisman Sugar Corp., 162 So. 2d 517

Febles v. Talisman Sugar Corp.

162 So. 2d 517 | Fla. | 1964

PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date October 29, 1963.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dis*518pensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law. The petition is therefore denied.

DREW, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, THORNAL and O’CONNELL, JJ., concur.