History
  • No items yet
midpage
Featheringham v. Eckle
81 Ohio Law. Abs. 450
Ohio Ct. App.
1957
Check Treatment

OPINION

By THE COURT:

Submitted on motion of the respondent to require the petitioner to make his petition definite and certain by specifically stating wherein he is unlawfully restrained of his liberty without legal authority as alleged.

Petitioner specifically avers that “he is unlawfully restrained of his liberty without legal authority, by Superintendent R. B. Eckle, in the London Prison Farm, London, Ohio.” (Emphasis ours.)

The petition conforms in every particular with the requirements of §2725.04 R. C., except the inclusion of a copy of the commitment by v/hich he is held as a prisoner. It has become the practice in this district for the respondent to file the mittimus with his answer to the petition.

The motion will be overruled.

HORNBECK, PJ, WISEMAN and CRAWFORD, JJ, concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Featheringham v. Eckle
Court Name: Ohio Court of Appeals
Date Published: Dec 28, 1957
Citation: 81 Ohio Law. Abs. 450
Docket Number: No. 243
Court Abbreviation: Ohio Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.