| Ga. | Dec 12, 1902

Candler, J.

The verdict rendered was not objectionable for indefiniteness; the evidence, while conflicting, was sufficient to warrant the jury in finding for the plaintiff; and it does not appear that the court, for any reason assigned, erred in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concurring, except Lumpkin, P. J., absent,
© 2024 Midpage AI does not provide legal advice. By using midpage, you consent to our Terms and Conditions.