History
  • No items yet
midpage
Fears v. Fears
42 S.E. 999
Ga.
1902
Check Treatment
Candler, J.

The verdict rendered was not objectionable for indefiniteness; the evidence, while conflicting, was sufficient to warrant the jury in finding for the plaintiff; and it does not appear that the court, for any reason assigned, erred in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concurring, except Lumpkin, P. J., absent,

Case Details

Case Name: Fears v. Fears
Court Name: Supreme Court of Georgia
Date Published: Dec 12, 1902
Citation: 42 S.E. 999
Court Abbreviation: Ga.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.